Thursday, 4 June 2015
Virgin: Stop Hiding Behind the NHS Logo
Virgin: Stop Hiding Behind the NHS Logo |  |
You might have heard that since 2012, private companies like Virgin have been running more and more NHS services. But when they run these services, they don’t have to use their own logo – they can hide being the white and blue of the NHS.
Why the cover up? Could it be that the government and private companies do not want us to know how may contracts in our NHS are being won by private contractors?
I’m Ron, I'm a retired GP and NHS Activist from East London. I’m writing because I don’t think that’s right. Patients should know whether or not they’re being treated by the NHS. Please sign this petition now, and let’s ask Virgin to tell us when they’re treating us.
Virgin spends millions promoting their brand. Their logo appears on trains, planes, even wine bottles. But when it comes to a lot of the NHS, they hide away – their logo doesn’t appear anywhere on some of the NHS services they run. They know most of us don’t want to be treated by someone who will profit from our illness, so it’s our job to expose them. Together, we can help shine a light on what’s really happening in our NHS.
Earlier today, activists like myself staged a protest in front of the Virgin Care HQ inLondon. It’s our way of telling people that some of our NHS services are not what we think they are - they've become Virgin profit centres. Act now, and let's make sure more people know about what's going on in our NHS.
But Virgin are only doing what the government allow them to do. The government lets companies use the NHS logo because they don’t want us to see, every time we use our NHS, that it’s being sold off. That’s why this petition needs to go as widely as it can. The more people who know about Virgin, the more they’ll discover about the sell-off of our NHS. With a new government in power, this is our chance to pressure them to change. Please sign the petition today.
Thanks for all you do, Ron Singer, NHS activist | |
Monday, 1 June 2015
Fulham GP backs council call to save A and E at Charing Cross Hospital
A long-serving Fulham GP has backed Hammersmith & Fulham Council’s calls to save the A&E unit at Charing Cross Hospital.
Dr Mike Evans was one of many local residents and health professional who contacted the council this week to share concerns with the NHS plans. He said: “I have been a GP in Fulham from 1987 to 2015 and have a pretty good knowledge of what is needed in terms of local medical services. The [planned] downgrade of Charing Cross and the rebuild of a token small medical service to try and keep people happy is nothing short of a dangerous disgrace.
“I have known so many instances of Chelsea and Westminster Hospital being totally unable to cope with emergencies and in admitting patients. So to lop off a large hospital like Charing Cross is madness. I’m disgusted.”
This was echoed by Geoffrey Castle, who wrote: “Whoever thinks that closing Charing Cross hospital A&E is a good idea must be totally bonkers! The cost of building a new ‘fit for purpose’ hospital facility to replace the current one would greatly outweigh any short term financial benefit gained by selling off the land.”
The council received the comments after publicising the grilling of health bosses at the final public hearing of the North West London Healthcare Commission – an independent coalition of Harrow, Brent, Hammersmith & Fulham, Ealing and Hounslow councils examining the NHS’s controversial Shaping a Healthier Future programme.
These plans would replace Charing Cross’ A&E with an urgent care clinic and dramatically reduce other services at the hospital, with much of the existing site sold off. The plans have already seen the closure of the A&E at Hammersmith and Central Middlesex hospitals last year despite protests by the council and residents. Since then, remaining local hospitals have regularly missed targets for waiting times.
Another comment came from Louis Joshua Manson, who recounted a tale of his 90-year-old friend needing treatment for a gash on her leg. After his friend was told they were facing a three-hour wait at Chelsea & Westminster, he wrote: “Closing Charing Cross’s A&E will make the situation at C&W even worse and should be rigorously opposed.”
And Ron Williams wrote: “I had to go to St Mary’s Hospital [recently] – the place is old dirty and every department is all over the place. You have to go miles round if you are disabled because of stairs everywhere. This hospital is not a touch on Charing Cross Hospital and the move is down-right ridiculous.”
Meanwhile, Charing Cross Hospital employee Valerie Falzon shared her experience as a theatre nurse by writing: “We are always busy, overworked and understaffed.”
One of the council’s main concerns about the NHS plans to centralise services in St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington is that hospital bosses have not factored in the expected boom in population in Hammersmith & Fulham. In Old Oak alone, the population is expected to swell by 70,000 new residents due to development plans on the northern edge of the borough.
Residents share these concerns, with Prue Angus writing: “Please do not close Charing Cross Hospital. St Mary's cannot cope with the number of patients now. It will be a nightmare with the influx of many more people in the future.” While Maggie Hodd added: “Building hundreds, if not thousands, of new homes plus closing A&E units at hospitals equals disaster.”
And worried about whether St Mary’s could cope with the increase in patient numbers, Sally James said: “It is common knowledge that the A&E performance at Charing Cross in the past has been infinitely superior to that of St Mary's in Paddington. It is ludicrous to make any structural changes to this service. No one in the area wants change - we thoroughly object to it.”
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, which runs Charing Cross Hospital, says that it is planning a £150million redevelopment of the site, with a ‘wide range of specialist, planned care and an emergency centre’. However, they admit that the number of in-patient beds will drop from 360 to just 24, while the number of day-case beds will rise from 41 to 86.
The North West London Healthcare Commission’s final report is expected to be published this summer.
To watch all of the Commission’s public hearings, visit:https://www.youtube.com/user/hammersmithandfulham
» Send us your comments now
Sailor died from internal bleeding after A&E sent him to minor care unit
Keen sailor: Guy Bessant at the tiller of a boat on the Thames
The sister of a sailor who died a day after being sent home from hospital after falling ill on the Thames issued a warning today about the downgrading of London A&E departments.
Anna Bessant’s brother Guy, 45, was taken to Charing Cross hospital by paramedics alarmed at his “grossly abnormal” high blood pressure.
But an A&E nurse tasked with filtering out less serious cases wrongly sent him to the urgent care centre next door, where two GPs failed to realise he had suffered massive internal bleeding, and sent him home with medication for back pain.
West London coroner’s court heard Mr Bessant was found dead at home in Wandsworth by his sister the following day. He had suffered an aortic dissection — a tear in the main heart artery. In a narrative verdict, oroner Chinyere Inyama said there had been an “erroneous referral” to the urgent care centre and “a series of system failings”.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust — which runs hospital in Hammersmith but not the urgent care centre, is at the centre of a row over the proposed downgrading of emergency care at Charing Cross. The A&E would lose its consultants and become an “emergency centre” run by GPs and emergency nurse practitioners.
West London coroner’s court heard Mr Bessant was found dead at home in Wandsworth by his sister the following day. He had suffered an aortic dissection — a tear in the main heart artery. In a narrative verdict, Coroner Chinyere Inyama said there had been an “erroneous referral” to the urgent care centre and “a series of system failings”.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust — which runs hospital in Hammersmith but not the urgent care centre, is at the centre of a row over the proposed downgrading of emergency care at Charing Cross. The A&E would lose its consultants and become an “emergency centre” run by GPs and emergency nurse practitioners.
West London coroner’s court heard Mr Bessant was found dead at home in Wandsworth by his sister the following day. He had suffered an aortic dissection — a tear in the main heart artery. In a narrative verdict, Coroner Chinyere Inyama said there had been an “erroneous referral” to the urgent care centre and “a series of system failings”.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust — which runs hospital in Hammersmith but not the urgent care centre, is at the centre of a row over the proposed downgrading of emergency care at Charing Cross. The A&E would lose its consultants and become an “emergency centre” run by GPs and emergency nurse practitioners.
West London coroner’s court heard Mr Bessant was found dead at home in Wandsworth by his sister the following day. He had suffered an aortic dissection — a tear in the main heart artery. In a narrative verdict, Coroner Chinyere Inyama said there had been an “erroneous referral” to the urgent care centre and “a series of system failings”.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust — which runs hospital in Hammersmith but not the urgent care centre, is at the centre of a row over the proposed downgrading of emergency care at Charing Cross. The A&E would lose its consultants and become an “emergency centre” run by GPs and emergency nurse practitioners.
He was a member of London Corinthians Sailing Club
Ms Bessant said: “If you are keeping an A&E you need to make sure it’s properly staffed with people who have the qualifications and experience to make sure the right decisions are made as to where patients are seen.” Mr Bessant, a chartered surveyor, belonged to London Corinthian Sailing Club.
The court heard he was taken to Charing Cross A&E on July 13, 2013. Paramedics Christina Campbell and Felicity Neale — who were praised in court — expressed disbelief when triage nurse Kiran Gohel told them to take Mr Bessant to the urgent care centre.
He was briefly checked by locum GP Dr Marios Kyriazis, before being seen by GP, Dr George Simons. Poor procedures in the hospital meant the GPs never saw Mr Bessant’s blood pressure reading, which paramedics had taken, the court heard. The GPs failed to realise it had halved in only 43 minutes.
Dr Simons said: “I remember him sitting in front of me, saying: ‘I’m fine now.’ When I heard what happened, I wanted to give up my job.”
Imperial said it now carries out a series of checks before referring an ambulance patient to the urgent care centre. This had saved the lives of two patients in the last year. It added: “We would like to offer our apologies that the standard of care Mr Bessant received fell below that which we strive to provide.”
Check the Evening Standard link:
Hospital bosses slammed for closure plans
NHS bosses were grilled about plans to cut services at Charing Cross Hospital and close its A&E unit – while replacing it with a new facility a fraction of its size and capacity – at a public hearing.
The independent North West London Healthcare Commission, led by esteemed barrister Michael Mansfield QC, concluded a series of hearings investigating the NHS plans last week.
The commission was initiated by Cllr Stephen Cowan, Leader of Hammersmith & Fulham Council. The Commission is funded by the London boroughs of Brent, Ealing, H&F, Harrow and Hounslow, to examine the Shaping a Healthier Future (SAHF) proposals from the NHS.
These plans would dramatically reduce services at Charing Cross Hospital and sell off part of the site – and has already seen the closure the A&E at Hammersmith Hospital last year, despite protests by the council and residents.
“Residents want their council to stand with them to defend local health services. That’s exactly what we’re doing,” said Hammersmith & Fulham Council Leader, Cllr Stephen Cowan.
“It is now clear that health bosses failed to consider huge anticipated rises in population, not least the 70,000 new residents moving into the northern ward of Hammersmith & Fulham in the coming decades. Meanwhile, there are real concerns about Imperial’s failures at St. Mary’s and its financial competence.
“Closing Charing Cross and shutting down much of north west London’s NHS would be catastrophic for residents and the long term provision of NHS care.”
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust runs Hammersmith, St. Mary’s and Charing Cross hospitals. Its plan involves selling off the significant proportion of land on the current Charing Cross site so it can make improvements to St Mary’s hospital in Paddington. Under that plan H&F residents would be expected to go to Paddington for many A&E services. Imperial hopes to downgrade Charing Cross Hospital’s A&E to an urgent care clinic.
To do this, Imperial hoped to pass an inspection by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) earlier this year.
However, Hammersmith & Fulham Council strongly opposes the plans to demolish Charing Cross Hospital and replace its A&E with an urgent care clinic, and identified a series of criticisms with Imperial’s plans and ability to manage their current service.
H&F’s concerns were submitted to the CQC, and Imperial later failed the inspection, which has delayed their plans.
In addition, the trust’s SAHF proposals do not take into account the estimated increase in the borough’s population of 70,000 new residents once the Crossrail and High Speed 2 rail links and new developments in Old Oak are built.
To watch all of the Commission’s public hearings, visit:www.youtube.com/
The final public hearing:
At the public hearing at Brent Civic Centre, the independent commission questioned the SAHF programme, which would see four out of nine West London hospitals downsized and their specialised services sent to St Mary’s in Paddington, Chelsea & Westminster or Northwick Park hospitals.
Dr Mark Spencer, Medical Director of the SAHF programme and Deputy Regional Medical Director, NHS England (London), was unable to explain why the business case for the reorganisation was still not finalised – despite seeing both the A&E units at Hammersmith and Central Middlesex hospitals shut.
“I’m not the person to answer financial questions,” said Dr Spencer, who added that the poor performance of local A&Es after Hammersmith Hospital’s unit was shut was only a ‘seasonal’ event – rather than a sign that demand for emergency care was beginning to outstrip supply.
However, growing disquiet at the knock-on effect on other hospitals, of the closure of emergency services at Hammersmith and Central Middlesex, has also resulted in the surprise announcement by NHS England of its own inquiry into how hospital reconfiguration in west London is being handled.
Dr Spencer was also questioned by commission member Dr Stephen Hirst, a retired GP from Chiswick, who asked if it was accurate to describe Charing Cross as a ‘hospital’ in the future given the NHS plans to reduce services and sell off land at the site. “It will do surgery, it is a hospital,” Dr Spencer answered.
Dr Hirst went on to describe the SAHF programme as a ‘juggernaut that has started and was impossible to stop’.
Fellow commission member John Lister, researcher on the People's Inquiry into London's NHS in 2012 and Senior Lecturer in Journalism at Coventry University, also clashed with Dr Spencer, asking: “Why are we reducing hospital services before the local community services are in place?”
Dr Lister also criticised the SAHF programme for its lack of a business case and said to Dr Spencer: “As a doctor, don’t you believe in reading the evidence and being sure of the outcome before you start?” With Dr Spencer responding: “The business cases are in draft, as I said.”
The Commission’s final report is expected to be published this summer.
Who is Michael Mansfield?
In 2013 Michael Mansfield QC chaired the Lewisham People's Commission, an inquiry into the proposals to close services at Lewisham Hospital. He has represented defendants in criminal trials, appeals and inquiries in some of the most controversial legal cases in the country.
He represented the family of Jean Charles de Menezes and the families of victims at the Bloody Sunday Inquiry. He chaired an inquiry into the shoot to kill policy in Northern Ireland and has represented many families at inquests, including the Marchioness disaster and the Lockerbie bombing. He also represents the family of Stephen Lawrence.
He is joined on the commission by Dr Stephen Hirst, a retired GP from Chiswick with extensive local knowledge and John Lister, researcher on the People's Inquiry into London's NHS in 2012 and Senior Lecturer in Journalism at Coventry University.
» Send us your comments now
This is INSANE the population of H&F increases & yet they want to close it.
Today I tried to make an out-patient appointment & was told nothing for 3 months. They must NOT be allowed to reduce hospital/medical services to the people of H&F they are already not good enough. Seek to improve them NOT reduce them.
From Peter on 28/05/2015 at 15:54
I have had to utilise the services provided at Charing Cross hospital and can not image the hospital not being there and how much further I would have to travel. Please stop this sheer short sightedness for financial gain......please stop this utter madness!!
From amh on 28/05/2015 at 09:14
I have had to utilise the services provided at Charing Cross hospital and can not image the hospital not being there and how much further I would have to travel. Please stop this sheer short sightedness for financial gain......please stop this utter madness!!
From amh on 28/05/2015 at 09:14
I fear for the lives of patients, I hear horror stories, I have seen the crisis on a personal level. To downgrade would be a local danger, but would hurt those in Barnes and Sheen too as it is their local hospital. Many departments are being moved under cover. It is shameful that doctors trained , funded by the tax payer have grandiose ambitions to destroy our NHS . Our health should be be at risk due to a political ideology.
Also I urge staff to stop acting like frozen rabbits and speak out . Can't sack 10,000 employees. I urge all users of Charing Cross Hospital in area or out of borough to come together, join campaignes and defend. Only you can do it.
From Pete G on 26/05/2015 at 02:15
As a regular user of Charing Cross Hospital I am appalled at the proposals
to reduce services at Charing Cross.
When I went to the Urology Out Patients
recently I had to wait 2 hours before I
could be seen. Charing Cross is a very busy hospital and any reduction in its services would be disastrous. Besides
if like me you are disabled the thought of having to go to St Mary''s
Hospital is really alarming.
John Newton
From Dr John Newton on 24/05/2015 at 12:25
It seems that no-one wants to make any modernising changes to the NHS and this council is no exception - most of the senior doctors I know say there must be consolidation.
From tim roberton on 24/05/2015 at 11:38
I cannot believe it has taken so long for the Powers that be to work out that building hundreds if not thousands of new homes plus closing A & E / hospitals equals disaster
From M. Hodd on 22/05/2015 at 08:23
Last Monday evening a 90 year old friend suffered a bad gash on her leg.Taken to Chelsea and Westminster A&E she was told there would be a 3 hour wait so she went home. The pain was so bad that she called Emergency and the doctor who saw it arranged for her to be taken immediately to C&W where she was attended to and kept overnight.Closing Charing X A&E will make the situation at C&W even worse and should be rigorously opposed.
From L.J.Manson on 21/05/2015 at 16:59
The population growth will be fuelled in the immediate future by the current growth in new office buildings, luxury riverside apartments and multiple occupancy flats currently being constructed throughout Hammersmith on every inch of available land.
Whoever thinks that closing Charing Cross hospital and A&E is a good idea must be totally bonkers! The cost of buiding a new "fit for purpose" hospital facility to replace the current one would greatly outweigh than any short term financial benefit gained by selling off the land.
From Geoffrey Castle on 21/05/2015 at 16:04
PLEASE SAVE OUR CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL - WE ARE ALL AGAINST THE CLOSURE PLAN
From K. Iskarous on 21/05/2015 at 15:14
I had to go to St Marys hospital on Tuesday and Wednesday the place is old dirty and every department is all over the place. You have to go miles round if your disabled because of stairs everywhere this hospital is not a touch to Charing Cross hospital the move is down right rediculous
From Ron williams on 21/05/2015 at 15:06
Please do not close Charing Cross Hospital. St Mary''s can not cope with the number of patients now. It will be a nightmare with the influx of many more people in the future.
From Prue Angus on 21/05/2015 at 14:38
It is common knowledge that the A nd E performance at Charing Cross in the past has
Been infinitely superior to that of St Mary''s Paddington- it is ludicrous to make any structural changes to this service no one in the area wants change we thoroughly object to it.
From James on 21/05/2015 at 14:07
Imperial is run by a bunch of power hungry greedy establisment. I should know - I am employed by them. I am theatre sister at Charring cross hospital. The trust is robbing us blind. Our overtime is stopped since the 1st of march, our bank rates are frozen, when we stay after hours we are allocated time back which is never given back as we are always busy, overworked and understaffed, we cover private patients on nhs time so the trust pockets the money which is supposed to be paid to us front liners
now they want us to spend more money in our canteen or they will close it down as it is costing the trust money to keep it open. All of this is demotivating, we are working for free for most of the time whilst the consultants get their full remuneration for private patients and managers will get their bonuses at the end of the financial year for saving money
and what do we get?
From valerie falzon on 21/05/2015 at 13:59
Why is LBHF tax payer's money being used on this inquiry? The council has no power over NHS. Surely the council is not empowered to spend our taxes on areas outside it's remit.
Reply from the council: Councils do, in fact, have a formal duty to scrutinise local health services and speak on behalf of local people on health issues. Health is not therefore outside our remit.
From SM on 21/05/2015 at 13:46
I have been a GP in Fulham from 1987 to 2015 and have a pretty good knowledge of what is needed in terms of local medical services. The closure of Charing Cross and the rebuild of a token small medical service to try and keep people happy is nothing short of a dangerous disgrace. It is yet another NHS decision that is politically led and bears no resemblance to what is best for the local community or sensible medically. I have had so so many instances of Charing Cross and Chelsea and Westminster being totally unable to cope with emergencies and in admitting patients - so to lop off a large hospital like Charing Cross is madness. The people who run Imperial are fixated with centralising everything at St Mary''s and seem unable to take a broad view of what is best medically and what is best for the people - just what suits themselves. I feel so very let down by Imperial and the government ministers who presumably have a final say in this. It is politics rather than looking after the community and I''m disgusted.
From dr mike evans on 21/05/2015 at 13:44
The complete lack of understanding of the local community and the devastating impact in local long term sick and elderly people is quite overt and startling to say the least. Clearly, those who are empowered to make these life changing decisions could not care less about local people and wish to reshape the community into something akin to a socially cleansed neighbourhood suitable only for the rich.
From Catherine on 21/05/2015 at 13:07
A&E is a jumble accepting everyone . It would be more successful if it split its intake. So one hospital would deal with patients over the age of 75 only and it would be more successful in specialising in geriatric care.
Another hospital could specialise only in care for children of school age. 1 to 16.
Once we start splitting into these age groups which can. Achieve economy of effort.
From Bozidar Zabavnik on 21/05/2015 at 13:00
Monday, 4 May 2015
.jpg)
Andy Burnham calls for halt to London NHS closures plans for Hospitals and A&Es
One Week to Save the NHS event with Jo Brand and Andy Burnham 02/05/2015
Andy Burnham calls for halt to London NHS closures plans for Hospitals and A&Es
Andy Burnham says Imperial Trust is not meeting A&E targets...
Jo Brand on the NHS
NHS worker talking about the pressures on the NHS
Dr Clare Gerada on the NHS
Dr Clare Gerada talks about mental health
_edit1.jpg)
.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
_edit1.jpg)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
One in four patients have had to wait more than four hours for treatment since the closures of neighbouring units nine weeks ago Gareth... -
Help us to SAVE our beloved Charing Cross Hospital from DEMOLITION, please SIGN and SHARE this petition, it will take just a few seconds... ... -
Support SW London SW London Keep Our NHS Public Group have invite SOH to have a stall at their public meeting "How can we save the NHS?...
-
April 2017 Dear Supporter, Who is telling the truth? For nearly 5 years Save Our Hospitals has been campaigning, with local resid... -
We're going to defend our Hospitals -Labour Leader Stephen Cowan https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=7SKMlhhSDHc We call on a morato... -
On Thursday night Imperial Healthcare Trust, which runs Charing Cross, Hammersmith and St Mary’s Hospitals, published details of th... -
-London Ambulance Service made warning over struggling emergency unit -Paramedics now can't take patients directly to Northwick Park ...
